1 00:00:04,520 --> 00:00:08,880 Welcome to our latest Ethics Village Talk. 2 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:14,360 We are very fortunate to have with us today Jessica Wilkerson from the FDA. 3 00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:15,740 Jessica, welcome. 4 00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:16,940 Thanks for taking time to talk to us. 5 00:00:16,940 --> 00:00:20,840 Thank you so much for... well, thank you so much for having me. 6 00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:25,980 So, first question, really kind of introductory. 7 00:00:26,500 --> 00:00:28,560 Tell us a bit about yourself. 8 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:31,120 You've had a super exciting and interesting career. 9 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:35,120 You've done a bunch of different policy things, all of which have been really important. 10 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,740 Tell us a bit about yourself and how you ended up at the FDA. 11 00:00:40,160 --> 00:00:40,820 Sure. 12 00:00:40,820 --> 00:00:44,200 So, I don't know... I've had an exciting career development. 13 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:45,140 That's good news. 14 00:00:45,140 --> 00:00:46,200 It's good to hear. 15 00:00:47,140 --> 00:00:50,540 But I... so, I'm currently at the FDA. 16 00:00:50,540 --> 00:00:52,900 I am a cyber policy advisor. 17 00:00:53,320 --> 00:01:03,740 So, I generally work with... across the FDA to do... to look at cybersecurity of medical devices, not necessarily in the review of them necessarily. 18 00:01:03,740 --> 00:01:06,720 I leave that to people who are much more qualified than I am. 19 00:01:06,820 --> 00:01:14,400 But looking at various concepts... I'm so sorry, my cat is causing me a whole bunch of problems. 20 00:01:14,420 --> 00:01:15,120 There we go. 21 00:01:15,120 --> 00:01:16,640 That's a bonus round here. 22 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:17,880 That's totally allowed. 23 00:01:17,940 --> 00:01:21,800 If the cat has opinions on your career trajectory, that's totally welcome too. 24 00:01:22,180 --> 00:01:24,900 I'll be sure to quiz him later. 25 00:01:26,180 --> 00:01:43,760 But essentially, I look at things like software bill of materials, coordinated disclosure, things like legacy devices and others that I think we're going to get into a little bit later that from a higher level, more so than the review level, will really influence what it means for a medical device to be cyber secure. 26 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:49,280 And I ended up at FDA through sort of a very winding process. 27 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:57,660 And I guess I will work backwards to sort of explain how I ended up here and why a lot of the experience that I brought with me to the FDA is relevant. 28 00:01:57,660 --> 00:02:01,040 But prior to this, I was with the Linux Foundation. 29 00:02:01,040 --> 00:02:03,120 I was the Cybersecurity Research Director. 30 00:02:03,500 --> 00:02:12,240 And this really stemmed from a recognition that I had a few years ago that I think many other people had had much earlier than I had it. 31 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:16,980 But essentially around this reality that open source software isn't everything. 32 00:02:16,980 --> 00:02:19,120 Everything is built out of open source software. 33 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,840 It is the basis of modern technology today. 34 00:02:23,060 --> 00:02:31,560 And so if we want to have cyber secure products and cyber safe products, we have to have secure and safe open source software. 35 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:42,500 And you know, given the characteristics of the open source ecosystem, that is a more challenging undertaking than it traditionally is in more proprietary or closed source software. 36 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:46,180 And so I spent a year with the Linux Foundation really examining those issues. 37 00:02:46,860 --> 00:02:52,340 But the bulk of my experience really came from working with the United States Congress. 38 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:58,120 I was a professional staff member and then had a few other titles throughout my time there. 39 00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:03,940 But I spent five and a half years with the Committee on Energy and Commerce doing cybersecurity issues. 40 00:03:04,340 --> 00:03:16,960 And so the thing to really know about the Committee on Energy and Commerce is that when it comes to congressional committees who have jurisdiction, Energy and Commerce is on a hill. 41 00:03:17,100 --> 00:03:26,720 So they have jurisdiction over energy, over healthcare, over telecommunications, over commercial issues, over... I'm missing a very obvious one that I can't think of. 42 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:29,640 But they have jurisdiction over so much. 43 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:43,940 And as technology has continued to weave its way into the fabric of daily society, what that means is that the sectors and the issues that Energy and Commerce has jurisdiction over began to do the same. 44 00:03:43,940 --> 00:03:49,020 So everything that we were doing in a lot of cases ended up taking on a cybersecurity bent. 45 00:03:49,340 --> 00:03:53,960 So I ended up looking at just this whole host of things when I was working for Energy and Commerce. 46 00:03:54,300 --> 00:04:10,400 Things all along the spectrum from the way that the federal government divides authority between different federal agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services or Homeland Security or the Department of Energy when it comes to cybersecurity emergency response. 47 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:17,360 I looked at things like the 2017 ransomware outbreak and what that meant and what kind of things that that had. 48 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:20,240 Just sort of all across the board. 49 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:40,080 And what ended up happening is the last couple of years that I was there was really starting to represent the shift in the healthcare sector's mentality to recognize that cybersecurity wasn't just this little tiny part of their lives where you could have the IT people sort of off in their corner or their basement doing whatever it is, 50 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,480 mystical arts that IT people do. 51 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,580 But this was a thing that affected patients. 52 00:04:45,580 --> 00:04:49,340 It was a patient safety issue and that they needed to be paying attention to it. 53 00:04:49,520 --> 00:05:01,980 And so I was really privileged in a lot of ways to be there sort of at the cusp of this realization and sort of work with many parts of the healthcare sector to develop it as it began to go. 54 00:05:01,980 --> 00:05:11,200 So I worked with the Food and Drug Administration where I now sit and others to really encourage the healthcare sector to adopt software-available materials. 55 00:05:11,660 --> 00:05:15,440 We were huge advocates when I was on the Committee of Coordinated Disclosure. 56 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:21,980 And we were starting to look at things like old and outdated medical devices and things like that and what should be done. 57 00:05:22,140 --> 00:05:44,320 So sort of through that spectrum of experience, starting with Energy and Commerce going to the Lawrence Foundation and then ending up at FDA, what I hope to bring, what I try to bring is just this very broad breadth of experience on these various cyber security issues that help inform the way that we approach, 58 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:46,760 as an agency, cyber security. 59 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:52,920 It's all about the wizards in the dark corners, right? 60 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:53,960 Yes. 61 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:57,380 So what types of issues do you work on today at FDA? 62 00:05:57,380 --> 00:06:01,940 You've mentioned Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure and probably policy stuff. 63 00:06:01,940 --> 00:06:06,000 What can you tell us about the issues that you encounter on a regular basis? 64 00:06:06,820 --> 00:06:11,820 Yeah, so I think they generally tend to split into two buckets. 65 00:06:11,840 --> 00:06:28,680 There are the sort of the internal agency machination issues where, speaking of Coordinated Disclosure and software-available materials and these things, medical device vulnerabilities or cyber security vulnerabilities that are relevant to medical devices come in on a very regular basis. 66 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:33,360 And the agency has to look at those vulnerabilities and decide what do we need to do with them? 67 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,300 What do we need to do with them and what do we need our stakeholders to be doing with them? 68 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:52,800 And so I spend a significant part of my day working with dedicated experts within the agency looking at cyber security vulnerabilities that might impact medical devices and ensuring that not only FDA but the sector as a whole is doing what it needs to do. 69 00:06:53,360 --> 00:07:06,060 This often involves third-party security researchers who either bring vulnerability information directly to us or, on an increasing basis, which we like, they go directly to the manufacturer. 70 00:07:06,220 --> 00:07:19,500 And the manufacturers, medical device manufacturers, have certainly matured over the last couple of years to the point where when a security researcher knocks at their door, they're not sort of running around like chickens with their heads cut off, freaking out. 71 00:07:19,500 --> 00:07:21,520 They're actually like, oh, yes, great, please come in. 72 00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:23,360 Tell us everything you know about this vulnerability. 73 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:29,600 Let us work together to address it, which has been a very, very positive development overall. 74 00:07:29,980 --> 00:07:42,360 We are also very much hard at work on just continuously updating FDA's cyber security processes, policies, all of that when it comes to looking at the cyber security of medical devices. 75 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:49,100 Technology evolves on a constant basis, which means that FDA's procedures can't be static. 76 00:07:49,100 --> 00:07:54,640 So on a day-to-day basis, we have to continuously re-evaluate the way that we approach cyber security. 77 00:07:54,660 --> 00:08:03,380 And if we need to make adjustments to our own process or encourage adjustments in the sector as a whole, that's another thing that I spend quite a bit of my time doing. 78 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:12,100 The last thing that I would just touch on relatively quickly is there are all of these private partnerships that exist out in the sector. 79 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:24,540 And some of the ones that we end up working with the most are the Healthcare Sector Coordinating Council, which is just a very valuable body to us where government and private sector just come together. 80 00:08:24,700 --> 00:08:26,640 Really, I think almost anybody can join. 81 00:08:26,980 --> 00:08:31,280 The executive director might have some words with me about that, but I think it's pretty open. 82 00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:34,800 And we talk about the issues of the day. 83 00:08:34,940 --> 00:08:38,260 I'm actually co-leading two task groups underneath that group. 84 00:08:38,260 --> 00:08:42,380 One to look at legacy devices and try and figure out what we do with old stuff. 85 00:08:42,380 --> 00:08:44,020 How do we get old stuff out of hospitals? 86 00:08:44,020 --> 00:08:47,280 How do we make sure that new stuff doesn't become old stuff too soon? 87 00:08:48,880 --> 00:09:01,560 And then another one on vulnerability communications, because I think what we've seen on an increasing basis is where your typical cybersecurity advisory being like, hey, there's a problem . 88 00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:03,960 They're hard to understand. 89 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:12,960 I mean, you really kind of have to have a lot of background and a lot of technical expertise to be able to read a cybersecurity advisory and understand what it's telling you and know what you're supposed to do. 90 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:18,260 Well, if you're a patient just trying to be like, hey, I heard there was a vulnerability in my pacemaker. 91 00:09:18,480 --> 00:09:19,580 What do I do? 92 00:09:19,580 --> 00:09:21,720 And you're not a computer science expert. 93 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:26,420 You're going to have very little idea what you're actually being told. 94 00:09:26,860 --> 00:09:27,900 And so that's a huge problem. 95 00:09:27,900 --> 00:09:29,680 That's something that we're trying to address. 96 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,820 So it's another thing that I work on on a day-to-day basis. 97 00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:36,520 So you mentioned the FDA guidance. 98 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:46,200 Can you give us just a really quick thumbnail sketch of the pre-market, post-market guidance, kind of the overall regime of the way that FDA approaches security vulnerability disclosure? 99 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:47,600 Yeah. 100 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:58,940 So if you think of a device, if you think of the lifetime of a device, it sort of has probably four stages. 101 00:09:58,940 --> 00:10:08,900 You've got the pre-market stage where it's being developed, it's being designed, and then it's being presented to FDA by a company to essentially say, we want to put this device on the market. 102 00:10:08,900 --> 00:10:11,380 And that's the pre-market stage. 103 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:25,240 And so during the pre-market stage, what FDA does is that device is essentially reviewed and the standard there is, does this device provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness? 104 00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:26,660 Now that goes beyond cybersecurity. 105 00:10:26,660 --> 00:10:33,620 That is literally, even from like a physical machinations perspective, does this thing do what it's supposed to do in a safe and effective way? 106 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:36,900 But obviously that counts for cybersecurity too. 107 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:48,860 So from the cybersecurity perspective in pre-market, our reviewers look at these devices, they look at the security controls that are built into it, and they essentially evaluate, are these good enough? 108 00:10:48,860 --> 00:10:49,800 Are these sufficient? 109 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:55,380 Do these do what they need to do to protect the device from cybersecurity threats and therefore protect the patients? 110 00:10:56,300 --> 00:11:02,920 If medical device manufacturers manage to pass the pre-market stage, then they obviously get to put the device onto the market. 111 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:07,140 And then that is known as the post-market stage. 112 00:11:07,660 --> 00:11:16,520 And so once the device is there, once it's in the marketplace, there's also guidance that FDA has put out around what do you need to do? 113 00:11:16,660 --> 00:11:20,840 Because as we all know, there is no such thing as a 100% secure product. 114 00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:25,100 And something that is secure today is not necessarily going to be secure tomorrow. 115 00:11:25,140 --> 00:11:29,940 So you have to have a process for monitoring devices that are on the market. 116 00:11:29,940 --> 00:11:37,520 You have to have a process for intaking information on potential issues to include cybersecurity and non-cybersecurity issues. 117 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:40,400 And you have to have a process for figuring out what you're going to do with it. 118 00:11:41,140 --> 00:11:58,040 And so FDA has post-market guidance on all of that, that essentially says to manufacturers, here are some suggestions that you really should follow around what you should do for medical device cybersecurity vulnerability that happens once your device is on the market. 119 00:11:58,780 --> 00:12:00,200 There's a lot of things there. 120 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:03,400 There's specific regulations on when you have to have a recall. 121 00:12:03,820 --> 00:12:10,980 But I think the biggest one for cybersecurity is it is in that guidance that you should have a coordinated disclosure program. 122 00:12:10,980 --> 00:12:20,680 So you should have a way to intake information from third parties, typically cybersecurity researchers, but it can be anybody, on cybersecurity vulnerabilities. 123 00:12:20,680 --> 00:12:31,040 And then once you have it, and this is a really key part that some people sometimes forget, you can't just take the information and be like, yeah, great, thanks, you actually have to then take the information and do something with it. 124 00:12:31,660 --> 00:12:38,780 And so that's sort of that last part of that post-market phase is if there is a vulnerability, how are you going to evaluate it within your company? 125 00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:44,620 How are you going to communicate that you've had a vulnerability and what you're doing about it to the agency? 126 00:12:44,620 --> 00:12:45,820 Because you have to tell us. 127 00:12:46,560 --> 00:12:48,420 And then how are you going to tell the public? 128 00:12:48,420 --> 00:12:52,860 Where it's appropriate to tell the public that there's been some kind of issue, what is that going to look like? 129 00:12:52,860 --> 00:12:54,460 How are you going to talk about it? 130 00:12:54,460 --> 00:12:55,780 What are you going to do for patients? 131 00:12:55,780 --> 00:12:56,880 All of that. 132 00:12:57,060 --> 00:12:59,160 So that's that post-market phase. 133 00:13:03,860 --> 00:13:07,500 So this involves a lot of cooperation with the private sector. 134 00:13:07,500 --> 00:13:11,320 What have been your experiences cooperating with the private sector? 135 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:17,640 And you mentioned that companies are improving in the way that they're engaging with security researchers. 136 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:24,000 Can you tell us a little bit about some of those dynamics and maybe share a few success stories of coordinating? 137 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:24,900 Absolutely. 138 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:42,820 Yeah, so I think what I would start out with is way back in the day when I was still in Congress, when medical device vulnerabilities were still sort of, I mean, they're still sexy today, you know, who doesn't love a your medical device can kill you headline. 139 00:13:42,820 --> 00:13:47,980 But when they when they're a little bit more new, they're a little bit more novel. 140 00:13:48,820 --> 00:13:58,240 What we would typically see happen is medical device manufacturers would get contacted by security researchers, and they would just be so confused. 141 00:13:58,680 --> 00:14:00,100 Who is this person? 142 00:14:00,100 --> 00:14:01,780 How did they figure this out? 143 00:14:01,780 --> 00:14:03,040 What is going on? 144 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:15,260 And usually, and Andrew, you probably know this better than anybody, they're like, sue them, sue them right now, make it so they can't talk about it, make it so that they clearly broke the law when they did this research. 145 00:14:15,260 --> 00:14:17,680 And so somebody like make them stop. 146 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:20,260 And that was really how it was handled. 147 00:14:20,300 --> 00:14:23,980 You have these security researchers who were like, hey, I found this problem. 148 00:14:23,980 --> 00:14:25,720 Do you do you want to know about it? 149 00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:28,000 And they were very good faith. 150 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:32,260 But there was just, it was such a new thing for these manufacturers. 151 00:14:32,260 --> 00:14:38,200 And there was so much in, you know, to give them a little bit of credit or to have a little bit of sympathy for the manufacturers. 152 00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:46,140 There's a lot that rides on them not having issues, you know, obviously, they're a heavily regulated industry. 153 00:14:46,140 --> 00:14:59,360 If there is a problem with their medical device, there's consequences, you know, whether those are regulatory consequences, or they are getting sued, or whatever it is, patient harm consequences, it's a big deal. 154 00:14:59,700 --> 00:15:14,240 And so it took them a significant amount of time and a significant amount of work by a lot of discrete parties within the security research community. 155 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:16,800 I'm sure, Andrea, you played a role in this. 156 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:33,380 Josh Corman, Bo Woods, Katie Masuris, Nina Ali, a lot of these folks put in a lot of time and effort to actually sit down with the medical device manufacturers and others, you know, this was also going on in auto and energy and other sectors, and essentially be like, 157 00:15:33,380 --> 00:15:38,240 look, we come in peace, like, we're really just trying to help you here. 158 00:15:39,320 --> 00:15:49,260 And over time, as you know, we had also some visionaries on the medical device side, and certainly my boss, I can't take credit for this, I wasn't at FDA at this time, but Dr. 159 00:15:49,260 --> 00:15:50,500 Suzanne Schwartz, Dr. 160 00:15:50,500 --> 00:15:51,940 Seth Carmody, Dr. 161 00:15:51,940 --> 00:16:01,280 Afton Ross, they actually sort of also went out on a limb and began to embrace the security research community. 162 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:18,160 There were some of these visionaries at these medical device manufacturers, Colin Morgan, Rob Suarez, Michael McNeil, others who really took the lead on recognizing that coordinated disclosure, and just the ability to be given information in a friendly way, 163 00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:22,520 rather than a blackmail way, helped everyone. 164 00:16:23,460 --> 00:16:42,940 And so from about, I don't know, 2015-ish to now, what we see much, much, much more frequently is the security researchers go directly to the medical device manufacturers who receive them with open arms, they have this continuous dialogue that we don't even know about for weeks, 165 00:16:42,940 --> 00:17:01,500 months, however long it takes place, and then at some point prior to the public disclosure, they come to us as a united front and essentially say, hey, this awesome guy over here, whoever found a cybersecurity vulnerability, they told us about it, here's all the things that we've done, 166 00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:13,080 they agree, they've checked our math, they think that it's correct, and we're going to just close on this day, we're going to do this, this is our plan for post-market, as we had discussed before. 167 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:25,940 And it's a much smoother, it's a much more collaborative, and it's a much more effective process for us as an agency, so we're not having to stand over everyone and check their work. 168 00:17:27,300 --> 00:17:31,400 And it really just benefits patients overall that we all have these relationships. 169 00:17:32,920 --> 00:17:44,260 If you were looking for specifics, like specific disclosures that I could point to, I'm trying to think, like, what are some of the best examples that we've run into lately? 170 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:51,840 It's been a little bit confused with COVID, as everyone can, I think, probably sympathize with, because there's a lot going on. 171 00:17:52,120 --> 00:17:57,400 But maybe one that I'll point out, too, this is the last one that FDA did a safety communication on. 172 00:17:57,620 --> 00:18:14,460 This is a cross-industry problem with Bluetooth low energy, and it didn't just happen in the healthcare sector, but we were the ones who ended up kicking off a lot of the response. 173 00:18:14,700 --> 00:18:21,980 But the researchers were in Singapore, the vulnerabilities impacted just numerous medical device manufacturers. 174 00:18:23,060 --> 00:18:33,520 But what was really impressive about that is our ability to connect the researchers to the medical device manufacturers and the researchers' willingness to be connected to the medical device manufacturers