1 00:00:21,540 --> 00:00:28,260 Hi, I'm Bryson Bort, and thank you for joining us today with the Election Security Panel with the Feds. 2 00:00:28,260 --> 00:00:35,240 This is a really momentous occasion, bringing this many federal agencies all together on one hand. 3 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:36,580 The timing is perfect. 4 00:00:36,580 --> 00:00:40,400 There is a huge election coming up here in the United States in 2020. 5 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,280 There are elections happening around the world. 6 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:47,200 And I think that's a key thing for us to understand, is that while this panel is talking about the U.S. 7 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:59,940 federal government, how we are responding to our American election, when we look at the broader forces that are aligned against democracy in the world, that all comes down to trust in the system for the democracy to work. 8 00:01:00,020 --> 00:01:02,980 And those forces are working against places more than the U.S. 9 00:01:02,980 --> 00:01:04,700 And so while this is going to be the U.S. 10 00:01:04,700 --> 00:01:11,580 government discussing this, I think citizens all over the world and hackers all over the world will be able to take something away from that. 11 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:14,040 Just quick logistics. 12 00:01:14,460 --> 00:01:17,660 Q&A will be available through the DEF CON Discord. 13 00:01:17,660 --> 00:01:28,120 So if you put your questions in the Voting Village DEF CON Discord, those will make it their way up here to me on the stage and we will answer them as best as we can. 14 00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:30,380 Starting off, we have Cynthia Kaiser. 15 00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:32,780 Hello, I'm Cynthia Kaiser. 16 00:01:32,780 --> 00:01:36,640 I'm an assistant section chief with the FBI Cyber Division. 17 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:43,640 And what that really means is I lead analysis among multiple threat groups for the FBI. 18 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:49,260 That includes election threats, mostly in the cyber arena. 19 00:01:49,340 --> 00:01:50,320 And that's by design. 20 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:55,400 I saw what happened in 2016 and I knew that there was nowhere else I wanted to be. 21 00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:58,140 And then working this threat as we came into 2020. 22 00:01:58,180 --> 00:02:02,680 And I'm really excited to be here with people that I get to see all the time anyways. 23 00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:10,220 And so for the FBI in the election space, a good way to think about it is that we're really focused on the threat. 24 00:02:10,220 --> 00:02:18,320 So we work hand in hand with our DHS counterparts and they're really focused on the risk to the systems, the remuneration on those systems. 25 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:32,360 But when it comes to the threat response of incidents or looking at investigations into malign foreign influence or investigations into election crimes like ballot fraud, that's where the FBI really plays in the space. 26 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:36,460 David Mordino from the National Security Agency. 27 00:02:36,460 --> 00:02:37,940 It's great to be with you here today. 28 00:02:37,940 --> 00:02:40,440 I'm an NSA election security lead. 29 00:02:40,460 --> 00:02:44,980 Most of you are familiar with NSA's mission, really divided up into two components. 30 00:02:44,980 --> 00:02:50,120 Our foreign signals intelligence mission, which is all about figuring out what the adversaries are up to. 31 00:02:50,120 --> 00:03:00,220 And then we have the cybersecurity component, which is all about preventing and eradicating threats to national security systems and figuring out how we can protect DOD networks and the like. 32 00:03:00,420 --> 00:03:04,560 Really a lot of power from NSA comes with combining those missions. 33 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:13,100 Knowing what the threat is and combining that with a technical analysis and mitigations in order for us to be able to deploy those into unclassified space. 34 00:03:13,260 --> 00:03:20,820 From an election security standpoint, I oversee all the activities and partnerships that NSA has on election security. 35 00:03:20,820 --> 00:03:28,000 I also co-lead something called the Election Security Group, along with Brigadier General Hartman here, which we'll get into, I'm sure, on the panel. 36 00:03:28,020 --> 00:03:33,180 And that's a joint NSA Cyber Command Task Force for protecting the elections. 37 00:03:33,180 --> 00:03:34,460 A little bit about me. 38 00:03:34,460 --> 00:03:35,200 I grew up in Chicago. 39 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:38,320 That's what I'm representing here in the Comiskey Park shirt, no white socks. 40 00:03:38,700 --> 00:03:40,640 And I'm also into craft cocktails. 41 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:45,580 I supplied, in the typical DEF CON tradition, a cocktail of Black Manhattan for everybody. 42 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:51,140 And I'd like to give a shout out to Johnny and Carl for hosting me at Cocktail Con this Tuesday. 43 00:03:51,140 --> 00:03:57,580 Really great event and a community in terms of getting the InfoSec community together to talk about cocktails, talk about security. 44 00:03:57,580 --> 00:03:58,820 So I appreciate it. 45 00:03:58,820 --> 00:04:02,120 I appreciate DEF CON folks for having us here today. 46 00:04:03,420 --> 00:04:05,020 Hey, I'm Joe Hartman. 47 00:04:05,020 --> 00:04:08,580 I command the Cyber National Mission Force, so part of U.S. 48 00:04:08,580 --> 00:04:09,560 Cyber Command. 49 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:13,700 As Dave said, I co-lead the Election Security Group with him. 50 00:04:13,860 --> 00:04:21,980 And, you know, the Election Security Group is really partnered with all the agencies you see represented here and others in defense of the 2020 election. 51 00:04:21,980 --> 00:04:23,100 We're the part of the U.S. 52 00:04:23,100 --> 00:04:25,220 government that focuses on the away game. 53 00:04:25,220 --> 00:04:33,220 So we are looking at foreign adversaries, Russia, China, Iran, any other foreign adversary who's attempting to interfere with our elections. 54 00:04:33,540 --> 00:04:44,580 We're looking for them in foreign space, and we're partnering with DHS and FBI in order to ensure that we share information that we find abroad that makes us safer here in the United States. 55 00:04:44,580 --> 00:04:47,160 I'm really glad to be here today and looking forward to your questions. 56 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:49,220 My name is Maurice Turner. 57 00:04:49,220 --> 00:04:52,160 I'm Senior Advisor for the Executive Director at the U.S. 58 00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:53,780 Election Assistance Commission. 59 00:04:53,780 --> 00:04:59,520 We're a relatively small agency compared to the ones you've heard from earlier today, but our mission is focused. 60 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:13,660 We help make sure that Americans all across the country and all across the world have the ability to participate in elections, whether they're going to be in any one of the 50 states, six territories, or stationed overseas. 61 00:05:13,660 --> 00:05:23,380 So our focus is really, how do we make sure that those voters have access to the polls and that they can vote safely, securely, and make sure that their vote counts? 62 00:05:27,060 --> 00:05:28,560 And I'm Matt Masterson. 63 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:32,420 I'm the designated survivor that was held back from the federal panel. 64 00:05:32,420 --> 00:05:38,440 So if anything happens, we can maintain federal continuity of operations on election security. 65 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:42,740 I'm in a secret skiff out in the Midwest somewhere. 66 00:05:42,740 --> 00:05:47,820 I appreciate the voting village for inviting me and the feds to participate. 67 00:05:47,820 --> 00:05:51,440 So thankful to Bryson for organizing. 68 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:58,060 And I know we're going to address the question of what's the greatest area of progress since 2016, where have we improved? 69 00:05:58,060 --> 00:06:09,460 I mean, the fact that you have a unified federal effort working to help support state and local election officials on this mission space, I think, speaks volumes. 70 00:06:09,460 --> 00:06:14,320 I work for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA. 71 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:16,020 I'm the election security lead there. 72 00:06:16,020 --> 00:06:19,700 Prior to that, I was a commissioner at the EAC, where Maurice now sits. 73 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:22,640 And before that, I was an election official in the state of Ohio. 74 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:30,640 So come from an election administration background, have had to learn the intricacies of both CISA and the IC. 75 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:48,600 And I'm so thankful to everyone sitting up on that stage for their patience with me and working with me and CISA to make sure we're supporting the almost 8,800 state and local election officials across this country, let alone the private sector that we work very closely with and members of academia and nonpartisan organization. 76 00:06:48,600 --> 00:07:03,820 Our focus at CISA is to get information, support, services, everything from penetration testing to routine cyber hygiene scans to incident response out to the state and local election officials to help support them and engaging with their voters. 77 00:07:03,820 --> 00:07:07,720 The reality is American elections are run at the state and local level. 78 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:18,360 And we want to do everything we can so that those state and local officials can talk to their voters about why the process is secure and why they should have confidence that their vote was counted as cast. 79 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:22,900 So really thankful for this panel and super excited to have this discussion today. 80 00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:25,720 Matt, that's a great segue. 81 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:30,400 Trust is key to the infrastructure, right? 82 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:45,500 The process for collecting the votes to determine our democracy starts with that trust and that begins with transparency and accountability, which is why I thought it was so critical to have this panel here for the government to talk about, okay, what's happened and what have we done? 83 00:07:45,500 --> 00:07:52,040 So 2016 is when I think this really grew into the consciousness as a significant issue that everybody understood. 84 00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:55,540 What exactly happened in 2016 and 2018? 85 00:07:57,540 --> 00:08:06,020 Well, on the cyber side, in 2016, Russia compromised multiple different election networks. 86 00:08:06,020 --> 00:08:09,500 That included the state network, that included two counties. 87 00:08:09,500 --> 00:08:22,700 And as a part of that, we've assessed that they really sought to at least conduct reconnaissance against all 50 states. 88 00:08:22,700 --> 00:08:27,000 To try to figure out where it was most vulnerable and where they could get in. 89 00:08:27,060 --> 00:08:30,320 Now, we don't think that had any effect on election. 90 00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:31,860 We have no information that that did. 91 00:08:31,860 --> 00:08:38,140 And really, where they were focused on, really couldn't have. 92 00:08:38,140 --> 00:08:43,940 But within that, it's obviously troubling because that's an attack on our election systems. 93 00:08:43,940 --> 00:08:45,700 It's attacking critical infrastructure. 94 00:08:45,700 --> 00:08:56,560 And it's something that now, looking at that and moving forward, that's why we partnered with everybody here to focus on, how do we, A, harden the networks so that can't happen? 95 00:08:56,560 --> 00:09:00,540 And how do we work to counter adversaries so they don't want to do it? 96 00:09:00,540 --> 00:09:05,680 And how do we ensure that we can be as transparent as possible? 97 00:09:05,680 --> 00:09:17,240 And that's included some various measures like both FBI and CISA will now tell a chief state election official if anything happens on a local election network. 98 00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:22,520 That's a change from 2016, and it's a necessary change for the transparency that you noted. 99 00:09:24,300 --> 00:09:27,940 Yeah, I mean, I think Cynthia covered the cyber side pretty well. 100 00:09:27,940 --> 00:09:32,920 From an influence side, I think most folks are tracking the infamous Internet Research Agency, Troll Farm. 101 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:44,720 So in terms of the social media operations that they were conducting in 2016 and 2018, also hack and leak operations could be very damaging. 102 00:09:44,720 --> 00:10:00,940 When we look at it in terms of evolution between 2016, 2018, and 2020, it was mostly focused on Russia in 2016, but we know that the threat is broader than that. 103 00:10:01,100 --> 00:10:05,320 For 2020, we're looking at the spectrum of all of our adversaries. 104 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:09,300 Russia, China, Iran, ransomware actors. 105 00:10:09,660 --> 00:10:11,820 There's more people in the game. 106 00:10:12,860 --> 00:10:14,620 They're learning from each other. 107 00:10:14,620 --> 00:10:18,620 Influence is a cheap game to get into now with social media. 108 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:20,820 It doesn't cost a lot of money. 109 00:10:20,900 --> 00:10:25,940 You can try to launder your narratives online through different media outlets. 110 00:10:25,940 --> 00:10:28,500 So that's something we're laser focused on. 111 00:10:30,220 --> 00:10:38,480 For us, in 2016, election security really wasn't a priority mission for the Department of Defense. 112 00:10:38,580 --> 00:10:43,740 It just wasn't something that we had previously focused on, heavily involved in other operations. 113 00:10:44,420 --> 00:10:50,960 And so while we were focused on other operations, the Russians obviously focused on our elections. 114 00:10:50,960 --> 00:11:03,180 We learned from that in 2018, between Cybercom and NSA, we formed what was called the Russia Small Group, really laser focused on Russian interference in the 2018 election. 115 00:11:03,220 --> 00:11:04,860 For us, that never stopped. 116 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:13,900 I got back to the command about a year ago in 2019, and we didn't start up this thing called the Election Security Group that was already working. 117 00:11:13,900 --> 00:11:22,080 And it never stopped working from 2018, and we think we're in a much better position now, certainly, than we were in 2016 or 2018. 118 00:11:22,900 --> 00:11:36,900 The big change from 2016 to 2018 and now into 2020 really started with the critical infrastructure designation that allowed all these federal partners to come together in a way that we'd be able to better protect our election infrastructure. 119 00:11:36,900 --> 00:11:49,540 And I think that that really is the key to all of this, which is information sharing, making sure that information is shared amongst agencies, but also to the state and local partners as well. 120 00:11:49,540 --> 00:11:52,620 The folks are actually running their own networks, their own infrastructure. 121 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:54,580 And so that's where EAC comes in. 122 00:11:54,580 --> 00:12:05,600 We have relationships, we're building those relationships with the state and locals to make sure that they understand the information that's coming to them from their federal partners, and that they realize that they're part of the solution too. 123 00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:09,100 It's how this all works. 124 00:12:09,260 --> 00:12:15,380 It's not just keeping those information notices in a silo and keeping them at the local level. 125 00:12:15,380 --> 00:12:24,640 It's a sharing up and down the stack to make sure that the infrastructure is protected, because it may not just be an attack that happens on a single state or a single county. 126 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:26,100 That might be happening other places. 127 00:12:26,100 --> 00:12:31,060 And if we're not sharing information, then the partners don't know that that coordination is going on. 128 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:35,880 Yeah, just to build off on what some of the other panelists have said. 129 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:43,540 For me, the biggest change has really been that level of coordination and support with state and local election officials. 130 00:12:43,540 --> 00:12:53,800 As many people know, when the critical infrastructure designation was made in 2017, there was a lot of resistance, understandably, from state and local election officials and skepticism. 131 00:12:54,180 --> 00:13:01,940 And we sat there in 2018 and had relationships with all 50 states, had information flowing, we're deploying Albert sensors. 132 00:13:01,940 --> 00:13:04,560 We sit here now on the brink of 2020. 133 00:13:04,560 --> 00:13:10,260 We not only have Albert sensors, so intrusion detection sensors deployed across networks in all 50 states. 134 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:20,380 We have an ISAC, an information sharing analysis center with close to 3,000 state and local partners receiving information, pushing information back to us. 135 00:13:20,380 --> 00:13:26,260 We're now deploying endpoint protection in many of the states and across localities to have additional insight. 136 00:13:26,260 --> 00:13:32,920 But really, that ability to coordinate across the federal government and push information back down to the state and locals has improved so much. 137 00:13:33,220 --> 00:13:42,740 The federal government, I think, is working in a way around election threat information that I don't know that it did around other issues. 138 00:13:42,740 --> 00:13:56,900 We are able now to take information, and state and locals are sharing all kinds of reporting with us, and push it across the interagency, the folks that you see sitting up on the stage here, and then push out alerts and warnings through the ISAC broadly to the community. 139 00:13:56,900 --> 00:14:06,680 And that's just a function that wasn't there certainly in 2016 and is really being honed and improved upon from 2018 to 2020, and that broad reach. 140 00:14:06,680 --> 00:14:27,520 And so that ability to really work with the election officials to understand risk, our risk understanding is much deeper than it was 2016 or 2018, to the point where as COVID has developed and kind of changed operations within elections offices, we've been able to be responsive and understand where the risk is shifting, 141 00:14:27,520 --> 00:14:39,900 and try to help gear our support, our information sharing, to understand that risk shift, so that they can take appropriate steps to mitigate that risk and really ensure the integrity of the election, and then turn around and message it to voters. 142 00:14:39,900 --> 00:14:58,460 And I think that's a theme you're going to hear throughout this conversation, really reach in that last step of talking to voters about their options, about how they can vote, about the process and security is really critical in an environment when we know adversaries are trying to undermine confidence in the process. 143 00:14:59,400 --> 00:15:14,440 So part of what we've learned, which stems from the problem, and a lot of what the solution has been, has been the designation of this as critical infrastructure, the federal collaboration, where this isn't the first time you're all meeting each other. 144 00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:16,580 You all know each other pretty well, right? 145 00:15:16,580 --> 00:15:26,180 I was talking to Bryson earlier that I've been on panels before with people from the government who are all working the same issue, and then you're meeting the person right before the panel starts. 146 00:15:26,420 --> 00:15:29,540 So when Bryson reached out and said, we're going to have a panel on election security. 147 00:15:29,540 --> 00:15:31,440 And I asked, OK, who's going to be on it? 148 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:32,980 And he started to tick it off names. 149 00:15:32,980 --> 00:15:38,560 And I'm like, OK, I talk to these people multiple times per week or sometimes every single day or multiple times a day. 150 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:43,160 So it really just shows how deep the collaboration is. 151 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,100 I spent a lot of time in counterterrorism. 152 00:15:45,100 --> 00:15:50,480 You think that's a mission that, you know, and it is a mission that the government rallies around. 153 00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:56,140 But election security, I don't get it out of the water in terms of how much we all talk to each other. 154 00:15:56,780 --> 00:15:57,740 Right. 155 00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:00,900 I mean, there's no better example than that. 156 00:16:00,900 --> 00:16:04,920 This panel is a representation of what's already happening. 157 00:16:04,940 --> 00:16:07,140 This panel is not the thing that is driving it. 158 00:16:07,140 --> 00:16:07,340 Right. 159 00:16:07,340 --> 00:16:10,560 We are capturing a moment in time of what's been accomplished. 160 00:16:10,660 --> 00:16:16,080 If we had tried to do this in 2016, we would have been spending the last 30 minutes all shaking each other. 161 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:17,220 So what do you do? 162 00:16:17,220 --> 00:16:18,200 What do you do? 163 00:16:19,560 --> 00:16:21,540 What exactly is that? 164 00:16:21,940 --> 00:16:23,420 Tell us about the Midwest, Matt. 165 00:16:23,420 --> 00:16:25,020 Like, we've never heard of these things. 166 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:26,580 Sorry, that's a Chicago thing. 167 00:16:27,660 --> 00:16:28,380 OK. 168 00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:31,440 And how information sharing isn't just sharing information. 169 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:31,600 Right. 170 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:36,280 But it's the fact that the information is being shared so that missions are being executed. 171 00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:38,000 Things are happening with it. 172 00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:38,340 Right. 173 00:16:38,340 --> 00:16:39,960 Those risks are being assessed. 174 00:16:40,380 --> 00:16:41,700 Those actions are being taken. 175 00:16:41,700 --> 00:16:43,700 And I really like the way you phrased it, Joe. 176 00:16:43,700 --> 00:16:43,920 Right. 177 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,560 We're playing the away game. 178 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:47,100 I'll translate that for everybody. 179 00:16:47,100 --> 00:16:49,560 Actually, why don't you translate what the away game is? 180 00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:49,720 Yeah. 181 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:50,220 So. 182 00:16:50,220 --> 00:16:53,100 So let me translate the away game at the end. 183 00:16:53,100 --> 00:16:56,040 I mean, if I could just talk about the collaboration, the relationships. 184 00:16:56,120 --> 00:17:00,100 You know, a good example is like the rehearsal that we did on Super Tuesday. 185 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:01,500 And so, look, I'm in the Army. 186 00:17:01,500 --> 00:17:04,180 I've been in the Army a long time, just like Dave. 187 00:17:04,180 --> 00:17:10,160 You know, I spent a lot of time in the CT fight and, you know, a lot of times in panel rooms and places like Afghanistan. 188 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:12,860 And, you know, we operate out of these joint operations centers. 189 00:17:12,860 --> 00:17:13,420 Right. 190 00:17:13,460 --> 00:17:20,360 And in the joint operations centers, we're sitting in there, as you can imagine, we love flat screen TVs, a lot of flat screen TVs on the wall. 191 00:17:20,360 --> 00:17:25,540 And, you know, unmanned aerial vehicles are flying around and other collection assets. 192 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:31,420 All that data is being pumped into the room where you're immediately able to make sense of it and then make decisions. 193 00:17:31,420 --> 00:17:34,540 You know, allocating resources, sending forces, doing what. 194 00:17:34,580 --> 00:17:43,600 And, you know, Super Tuesday, if you walked into the to the room that we were using as a mission center, you know, you would have seen cybercom personnel. 195 00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:47,840 You would have seen NSA personnel and you would have looked in a chat room. 196 00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:54,040 And almost every organization that you could imagine involved in the federal government is in a chat room. 197 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:57,720 OK, and they are talking about in almost real time. 198 00:17:57,720 --> 00:18:08,800 If something goes on on state election infrastructure in North Carolina, you know, there is an unclassified chat going up to DHS drops it in a classified chat room. 199 00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:23,400 You've got analysts from NSA and cybercom and other government agencies immediately combing their databases and then almost instantaneously providing information back that says, hey, this is something you should be concerned about. 200 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:26,660 Or this is just normal traffic that we see on any day on the Internet. 201 00:18:26,660 --> 00:18:32,480 It looks anomalous because we're paying a lot more attention to it right now because there's this thing called Super Tuesday going on. 202 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:39,940 You know, at the same time, I've got defensive cyber elements that are sitting in things we call war rooms and they are waiting on a call. 203 00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:45,340 You know, if there is something that happens that DHS needs help with, you know, they are trained. 204 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:49,500 They have collaborated in the past and we're ready to kick a team out. 205 00:18:49,500 --> 00:18:53,400 Additionally, we have elements that are that are sitting over in other off centers. 206 00:18:53,500 --> 00:18:59,260 Okay, and they are prepared if we see an adversary that's attempting to do something to interfere with that election. 207 00:18:59,260 --> 00:19:02,000 You know, we have the ability to play the away game. 208 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:05,820 And so we have the ability to go out in foreign space and look at what you're doing. 209 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:08,500 And we have the ability to make you stop doing that. 210 00:19:08,500 --> 00:19:20,280 And that's really the focus of what I think the federal government looks like from the local and state level all the way up through the national level to the Department of Defense. 211 00:19:20,280 --> 00:19:24,840 And, you know, for me as American, honestly, that was a pretty impressive experience. 212 00:19:25,380 --> 00:19:33,300 If I could take a slight turn from that, I think it is important to call out the collaboration that we have in the government. 213 00:19:33,300 --> 00:19:39,740 But I think the other evolution that's occurred is the engagement with industry here, right? 214 00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:44,720 I'm sure we have a lot of people who are, you know, working for the federal government all that year. 215 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:50,820 And I think that's been a major component of the shift in posture we have for election security. 216 00:19:51,020 --> 00:19:55,060 I mean, it's awesome when you're reading about, you know, disinformation networks being pulled out. 217 00:19:55,820 --> 00:20:03,880 Obviously, the cybersecurity companies really focused on election threats and trying to hunt down, you know, adversaries and what they're up to. 218 00:20:03,880 --> 00:20:16,200 You know, we can't do this mission without them and without industry help from state and local election officials, but also the cybersecurity companies and how we can feed off each other. 219 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:22,620 We learn from what industry is putting out and what we're providing value at and what we're putting out. 220 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:27,220 So people can leverage that in the systems and insights they have, right? 221 00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:30,840 Industry has a lot better insights than the government does in a lot of these cases. 222 00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:34,180 So they're a critical partner in this partnership. 223 00:20:34,980 --> 00:20:51,800 And I think that taking that a step further, even the individual level collaboration, you know, not just a big corporate or a company collaboration with the federal government, but people who call in suspicious information because they're worried about it. 224 00:20:51,920 --> 00:20:56,320 And they call DHS, they call FBI, they call any of us. 225 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:01,920 And they are calling because they're worried and they want to do the right thing. 226 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:11,920 And because those people call, the majority of the information that really we're able to get to state and locals since 2016, it's been because people called us. 227 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:15,880 They said they were concerned about something, we looked at it, and we said, you're right, and we got it out to everybody. 228 00:21:15,880 --> 00:21:21,400 So there's this element of that corporate industry responsibility and collaboration. 229 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:28,580 There's a federal government collaboration, but there's that individual collaboration too with all of us that it really is working well together. 230 00:21:29,560 --> 00:21:33,180 Yeah, Bryson, if I can just really quick on that. 231 00:21:33,300 --> 00:21:36,700 I think Cynthia raises a really good point and it's appropriate here. 232 00:21:36,700 --> 00:21:42,820 Just the fact that there's now a guide for coordinated vulnerability disclosure for state and local election officials. 233 00:21:42,820 --> 00:21:51,540 In 2016, as a member of the election community, I can tell you that was not a known commodity or something that they were even considering. 234 00:21:51,540 --> 00:22:07,180 And now we're progressed where folks like Jack Cable, who I know was on before, have built relationships with election officials, to help them understand the value of vulnerability disclosure and working with independent researchers and security experts in that way. 235 00:22:07,180 --> 00:22:18,060 The fact that private industry within the elections community is rolling out vulnerability disclosure policies and engaging in that conversation, not something that was going on in 2016. 236 00:22:18,060 --> 00:22:23,820 And so the multiple avenues of information, the multiple avenues of collaboration are really encouraging. 237 00:22:23,820 --> 00:22:25,680 I think we have a ways to go. 238 00:22:25,680 --> 00:22:29,920 I think there's lots of room for improvement, certainly on the federal side to help coordinate on that. 239 00:22:29,920 --> 00:22:36,460 At the state and local level, increasing capacity, the ability to intake and resolve and mitigate those vulnerabilities. 240 00:22:36,620 --> 00:22:56,400 But it's a drastic improvement from where we were even four years ago, and really speaks to the professionalism of state and local election officials in particular, who care deeply about the security of this process in their systems and want to find ways to improve and talk to their voters about the steps they've taken to secure it. 241 00:22:57,540 --> 00:23:02,560 This industry and this community has really matured very quickly compared to some others. 242 00:23:02,560 --> 00:23:16,560 And I think it's part due to events like this, like DEF CON, where researchers are coming together, talking about what's going on, where are their vulnerabilities, what are some ways we can fix it, taking a look at other industries like telecoms, aviation, 243 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:21,220 things like that, and getting those best practices out of the way kind of quickly. 244 00:23:21,620 --> 00:23:25,000 And as Matt was saying, it's because individuals care. 245 00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:31,480 And I think that's probably the biggest part of this that I want people to take away from this is that elections happen in communities. 246 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:37,760 And I think that's really what it comes down to is everyone gets a sense of how important it is at the very local level. 247 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:43,580 And all that builds up to build a sense of national urgency and importance about the issue. 248 00:23:43,660 --> 00:24:04,480 And to see the election officials really get on board with this idea that they are part of the defense network to make sure that we don't have interference playing in our elections and to see them, you know, get educated on the issues and really try to convey their own sense of confidence in their systems, 249 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:07,440 because they know what goes into running an election. 250 00:24:07,560 --> 00:24:09,340 It's not all just about cybersecurity. 251 00:24:09,340 --> 00:24:11,680 There are administrative tasks they need to do. 252 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:15,620 There are other tasks that some of them are even responsible for. 253 00:24:15,620 --> 00:24:17,580 And so, you know, they care deeply about elections. 254 00:24:17,580 --> 00:24:26,880 They want to make sure that everyone who votes has a level of confidence that they can feel when they go into the polling place or when they mail in their ballot. 255 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:30,720 So a follow-up question to Maurice and to Matt. 256 00:24:30,760 --> 00:24:34,620 This follows from a question from Neil McKernan. 257 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:39,640 And it is, we're talking to a very unique audience today, right? 258 00:24:39,800 --> 00:24:41,440 They are citizens of the world. 259 00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:44,240 They're American citizens, but they're hackers, right? 260 00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:49,960 This is the new system of the Internet that's there to figure out what works best. 261 00:24:49,960 --> 00:24:50,940 And here's the thing. 262 00:24:51,340 --> 00:24:54,040 They're doing it today in the voting village. 263 00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:55,780 They're doing it on the technology. 264 00:24:55,780 --> 00:24:57,320 We talked about industry involvement. 265 00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:08,880 We have individuals willing to take their time to actually dig into the technology itself to understand what works and what doesn't, because that gives us better trust in that technical implementation of the system. 266 00:25:08,880 --> 00:25:28,480 And so the full question here is, when would we start potentially having a prerequisite for entrance to the VVSG certification process that election system vendors adopt good vulnerability disclosure policies, as called out today, to make them widely available for penetration testing? 267 00:25:29,160 --> 00:25:35,580 I'll take that since EAC is in charge of the development and the approval of the VVSG. 268 00:25:35,580 --> 00:25:47,820 So those are guidelines that are used by states, and it directs the manufacturers to meet certain requirements so that they build their systems in a way that is accessible and secure and usable. 269 00:25:48,100 --> 00:25:57,140 And so I think the idea of a vulnerability disclosure policy being part of that would really just be the codification of industry best practices. 270 00:25:57,140 --> 00:26:07,520 Now, the manufacturers know that they are in competition to help bring a better level of security to these systems that are in use. 271 00:26:07,520 --> 00:26:09,260 And so I think that that's already happening. 272 00:26:09,260 --> 00:26:11,720 We've seen the fruits of that labor already. 273 00:26:11,720 --> 00:26:17,740 It didn't need to come from a federal agency to help the process along. 274 00:26:18,340 --> 00:26:22,060 So to answer Neil's question, it's already happening. 275 00:26:22,060 --> 00:26:28,580 And so as the industry continues to mature, I think that we'll see more and more vulnerability disclosure policies. 276 00:26:28,580 --> 00:26:33,640 And I'm hoping that you folks out there get interested in this sector and actually use them. 277 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:40,520 Find that legal way of doing the research and then reporting it responsibly to make sure that the problems actually get fixed. 278 00:26:40,520 --> 00:26:44,040 This isn't about a big bug bounty that you're going after. 279 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:46,520 This isn't about trying to embarrass anyone. 280 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:50,820 This is about strengthening our democracy, literally through strengthening our systems. 281 00:26:52,000 --> 00:26:57,080 Yeah, Bryson, just to just add a little bit, Maurice really tackled the meat of the issue. 282 00:26:57,080 --> 00:26:58,700 But I agree. 283 00:26:58,700 --> 00:27:10,600 I mean, we have had several vendors, election system vendors, come through our penetration testing process, what we call our critical product evaluation process up in Idaho. 284 00:27:10,700 --> 00:27:13,360 We have seen the private sector embrace that. 285 00:27:13,360 --> 00:27:20,920 And now we're starting to see, I think, the fruits of the work of not just the voting village, but the private sector companies to understand the value. 286 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:31,400 And frankly, the marketplace dictating that improves security steps towards coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes are going to be good for business. 287 00:27:31,400 --> 00:27:35,220 And that's why you see a reflection in progress being made. 288 00:27:35,220 --> 00:27:44,520 The private sector is hearing from customers, is responding, and I think we'll continue to see progress made on that level. 289 00:27:44,520 --> 00:28:00,840 I think one step we need to take, and I know the EAC takes this very seriously and states need to be thinking about it too, but to the extent it involves equipment, whether e-poll books or voting systems that they certify, you have to be ready to respond and adjust certification quickly, 290 00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:03,260 adapt to those type of processes. 291 00:28:03,260 --> 00:28:24,260 So I think we have a maturing to do sort of in the bureaucratic lane to make sure that we can support the private sector as they're changing and evolving and accepting this approach, that we support them in our certification processes and the way that systems need to be fielded. 292 00:28:27,370 --> 00:28:30,350 So that all ties back to that, what is the threat? 293 00:28:30,350 --> 00:28:33,290 China, Iran, Russia have been mentioned. 294 00:28:33,690 --> 00:28:35,050 How are they a threat? 295 00:28:35,050 --> 00:28:36,190 What are they doing? 296 00:28:36,190 --> 00:28:38,950 And are they the only threat that we need to be worried about? 297 00:28:40,970 --> 00:28:42,850 So I'll start with that one. 298 00:28:42,850 --> 00:28:45,730 I would say those are the main threats we're facing. 299 00:28:45,730 --> 00:28:56,050 Again, I think ransomware is like one of those wild cards out there that could be fielded by anyone, in theory, criminal actors, etc. 300 00:28:56,050 --> 00:28:59,210 So they could probably say more to that. 301 00:28:59,710 --> 00:29:09,950 So for Russia, I think in terms of an evolution, what we've seen, we talked about the Internet Research Agency, what they did in kind of social media accounts and the troll farms. 302 00:29:10,290 --> 00:29:15,250 In terms of 2020, we've seen a shift more towards the use of proxies. 303 00:29:15,250 --> 00:29:21,350 I guess I should maybe say intermediaries when we're in a technology crowd instead of saying proxies. 304 00:29:22,210 --> 00:29:31,190 So using, again, I mentioned before, laundering information through other individuals into the media space. 305 00:29:31,190 --> 00:29:35,090 The IRA, you've seen that shift tactics. 306 00:29:35,170 --> 00:29:53,110 They had set up something in Africa, in Ghana, in terms of trying to have people there, trying to put stuff online, posting things about socially divisive issues, using covert influence websites to be able to get their narrative out. 307 00:29:53,410 --> 00:29:56,910 So that's kind of a shift of tactic we've seen from the Russia side. 308 00:29:56,910 --> 00:30:07,410 China, I think scale is something that is a bit unmatched in terms of them as a threat, both from a cyber standpoint and from an influence standpoint. 309 00:30:07,410 --> 00:30:13,650 Certainly on influence, they've been very active in that region, Taiwan, Hong Kong. 310 00:30:13,870 --> 00:30:16,670 Then becoming potentially more aggressive in the U.S. 311 00:30:16,670 --> 00:30:20,950 space is something that we need to monitor and be prepared for. 312 00:30:20,950 --> 00:30:29,230 But in cyber, for the China cyber threat, they're a little bit different in terms of the scale and breadth of the targets they go after. 313 00:30:29,230 --> 00:30:30,450 It's like every U.S. 314 00:30:30,450 --> 00:30:37,470 citizen is a target of China, just because of the big data, PII that they're interested in collecting. 315 00:30:37,650 --> 00:30:43,270 Obviously, everyone's familiar with IP threat, besides just the standard intelligence-type targets. 316 00:30:43,450 --> 00:30:46,410 So I think that sets them uniquely apart. 317 00:30:46,410 --> 00:30:56,210 And Iran, just getting into the game, too, in terms of them trying to do social media influence and learning from what the other adversaries are doing. 318 00:30:58,450 --> 00:31:06,250 Yeah, so Russia, I would offer everyone you should read the report that came out from the State Department a couple of days ago. 319 00:31:06,290 --> 00:31:13,370 77 pages called the Pillars of Disinformation about the various sites operated by Russia. 320 00:31:13,370 --> 00:31:28,470 Just ask yourself, why in Russia, a country where few people read or write English, do they continue to put out a tremendous amount of English language news on these French news outlets? 321 00:31:28,470 --> 00:31:32,450 That really involved divisive issues that are U.S.-based. 322 00:31:32,450 --> 00:31:39,190 And so, again, a tremendous amount of platforms that the Russians invest in. 323 00:31:39,190 --> 00:31:48,950 CNN ran a great news exposé in April of 2020 about an organization that Dave referenced. 324 00:31:48,950 --> 00:32:01,230 So 18 Trolls in Ghana, led by a guy named Seth Wierdo, who grew up in Ghana, educated in Russia, and appears to have been on the payroll of the Purgosian network. 325 00:32:01,230 --> 00:32:04,830 So, again, it's about a seven-minute watch. 326 00:32:05,510 --> 00:32:10,790 And that can just provide you some insight into what the Russians are doing there. 327 00:32:10,790 --> 00:32:29,250 And then, you know, when we talk about private industry, you know, whether it's Facebook, Google, Microsoft, you know, there are dozens of articles about how these technology companies have identified this malicious behavior on their platforms that they're able to link back to the nation-state adversaries, 328 00:32:29,250 --> 00:32:30,310 Russia, China, and Iran. 329 00:32:30,310 --> 00:32:34,970 So, you know, I would tell everybody that there's a ton of stuff out there. 330 00:32:34,970 --> 00:32:40,410 You know, I know when we talk to CyberComm and NSA, we want to focus on that classified cyber box. 331 00:32:40,410 --> 00:32:47,450 But I'll tell you, there is a tremendous amount of great information already out there on the Internet that can provide you a lot of insight. 332 00:32:48,150 --> 00:32:52,230 You know, as Cynthia talked about, you know, we, you know, the U.S. 333 00:32:52,230 --> 00:32:59,750 government, you know, for you experts that are out there, you know, if you see suspicious activity, tell DHS. 334 00:32:59,750 --> 00:33:01,090 Tell the FBI. 335 00:33:01,090 --> 00:33:03,750 You know, we, the government, will do something about it. 336 00:33:03,830 --> 00:33:07,350 You know, if it's a domestic threat, those organizations will address it. 337 00:33:07,350 --> 00:33:09,370 If it's a foreign threat, they'll tell us. 338 00:33:09,370 --> 00:33:11,890 And I don't mean they'll tell us like six months from now. 339 00:33:11,890 --> 00:33:13,490 They'll tell us that day. 340 00:33:13,490 --> 00:33:15,710 They'll tell us early the next morning. 341 00:33:16,010 --> 00:33:21,070 You know, we had an incident the other night that, you know, occurred at 1.42 in the morning. 342 00:33:21,230 --> 00:33:24,950 And, you know, about 6 o'clock in the morning, we had cyber teams looking at the activity. 343 00:33:24,950 --> 00:33:33,850 So, again, for you experts out there, you know, you know better than anybody else if something weird is going on on the Internet. 344 00:33:33,910 --> 00:33:38,050 And I would just ask you to share that and we, the government, will take action. 345 00:33:38,150 --> 00:33:49,450 And I'd say, too, just from a cyber aspect, because I know we're talking to a lot of the hacker community, you know, leveraging trust relationships, you know, it's a common technique. 346 00:33:49,450 --> 00:33:49,750 Right. 347 00:33:49,750 --> 00:33:55,750 So, you know, some of these networks that they might be interested in are very well defended, just like the DoD. 348 00:33:55,750 --> 00:33:55,970 Right. 349 00:33:55,970 --> 00:33:59,570 But, you know, companies sometimes outsource their marketing departments. 350 00:33:59,570 --> 00:34:06,350 There's other other soft targets out there, think tanks, that could be lucrative even from an Intel perspective. 351 00:34:06,350 --> 00:34:10,190 You know, think tanks do policy work for politicians. 352 00:34:10,190 --> 00:34:12,090 They have contacts with elected officials. 353 00:34:12,110 --> 00:34:14,810 So, you know, sometimes going outside the bullseye. 354 00:34:15,370 --> 00:34:24,170 And again, a lot of this is common techniques, exploiting publicly known CVEs, you know, password spraying, spear phishing, you name it. 355 00:34:24,310 --> 00:34:28,690 You know, they're using Shodan, they're using Burp Suite, they're using those tools. 356 00:34:28,690 --> 00:34:37,770 They can get access to a network that maybe isn't inside the bullseye, leverage that, leverage an account, leverage a network connection to get into the target they're going after. 357 00:34:37,770 --> 00:34:39,550 And that's an important point. 358 00:34:39,550 --> 00:34:45,710 And that type of targeting hasn't really stopped from 2016 on. 359 00:34:45,730 --> 00:34:53,890 So spear phishing or looking for those networks that might be connected to the targets that they more desire. 360 00:34:54,210 --> 00:34:55,970 That's been continuing the pace. 361 00:34:55,970 --> 00:34:59,050 And I mean, we're tracking a lot of incidents even right now. 362 00:34:59,330 --> 00:35:06,030 And the good news with all those incidents is we haven't really seen any widespread impacts from those. 363 00:35:06,030 --> 00:35:13,330 But it's interesting because tracking a lot of incidents can feel scary. 364 00:35:13,330 --> 00:35:21,890 But it also gives me a lot of... it makes me feel better almost because I know that we're detecting every tremor. 365 00:35:22,070 --> 00:35:27,870 And that means we have a lot of false positives that we follow up on. 366 00:35:28,170 --> 00:35:31,710 I'd much rather that than not knowing things are out there. 367 00:35:31,710 --> 00:35:34,290 But it also means we have a fuller picture. 368 00:35:34,290 --> 00:35:41,470 And part of that fuller picture, as Dave mentioned, is on cyber criminals and not just ransomware. 369 00:35:42,270 --> 00:35:48,010 Other types of incidents as well and actors as well. 370 00:35:48,010 --> 00:35:59,170 And we really have to be on guard, not just if it's coming from Russia or China or Iran or a host of other groups, but a threat to an election network or a campaign network is a threat. 371 00:35:59,170 --> 00:36:04,310 And we need to be able to be really flexible in addressing that. 372 00:36:04,310 --> 00:36:17,450 And getting in front of that head on so that we can't make sure that come election day we're not dealing with a lot of pop-up threats and we're spending a lot of time trying to figure out really what happened. 373 00:36:17,490 --> 00:36:23,510 Yeah, I think that the nexus of cyber and the cyber threats and influence threats is a dangerous space. 374 00:36:23,510 --> 00:36:32,150 We know about Hackenleak and how that could impact potentially the voter populace and their opinions. 375 00:36:32,590 --> 00:36:44,570 But we were just talking before this panel, I think, in terms of using influence to make people distrust either the electoral outcomes. 376 00:36:44,570 --> 00:36:51,610 So you could have a ransomware incident in a local network that actually doesn't even impact. 377 00:36:51,610 --> 00:36:56,050 The elections counting or any of that. 378 00:36:56,050 --> 00:37:04,810 But someone could then spin an influence campaign when that gets reported to make people think it has had an impact and then not trust the results. 379 00:37:04,810 --> 00:37:05,030 Right. 380 00:37:05,030 --> 00:37:08,370 So that's one of those things that I think is worrisome. 381 00:37:08,370 --> 00:37:16,630 Even if a cyber attack doesn't actually have a measurable impact in terms of the conduct of the election or voting tallies. 382 00:37:17,570 --> 00:37:23,650 But, you know, if someone's able to take that and then try to spin off an information operations campaign from it. 383 00:37:26,010 --> 00:37:33,930 That point, I'd just like to drive home is that it's not just about, you know, what actually happened, where votes actually change. 384 00:37:33,930 --> 00:37:37,570 That's incredibly difficult to do at scale in a way that's undetectable. 385 00:37:38,310 --> 00:37:45,690 But if you can put that message out there that causes people to question and their local election official picks up that phone call and they don't have a good response for it. 386 00:37:45,690 --> 00:37:47,410 That can be just as damaging. 387 00:37:47,450 --> 00:37:54,650 So that's why at EAC we feel so strongly about making sure that local election officials have the tools, have the training that they need. 388 00:37:54,650 --> 00:38:02,390 So we partner with the Center for Tech and Civic Life to actually provide that basic intermediate level of cybersecurity training. 389 00:38:02,390 --> 00:38:05,810 So that they understand, you know, why is it important to have two-factor authentication? 390 00:38:05,810 --> 00:38:10,430 You know, what does it mean to actually have a password manager so you're not reusing your passwords? 391 00:38:10,430 --> 00:38:17,210 These are all basics that most folks that are watching us right now are thinking, how can anybody not know how to do that? 392 00:38:17,210 --> 00:38:23,710 But if you've never been taught that or if you don't have an understanding of the impact of that, then it might be too much work. 393 00:38:23,770 --> 00:38:29,290 But once you understand how much bad stuff that can actually prevent you recognize, it's actually not that difficult. 394 00:38:29,290 --> 00:38:32,750 It's actually pretty easy to use it if you are familiar with the tools. 395 00:38:32,970 --> 00:38:36,170 And then it gives you the confidence to stand up and say, you know what? 396 00:38:36,190 --> 00:38:39,010 Yeah, we heard about the ransomware or maybe we got hit with some ransomware. 397 00:38:39,370 --> 00:38:42,670 You know, the town down the street, but we're ready. 398 00:38:42,670 --> 00:38:44,090 These are the things that we're doing. 399 00:38:44,090 --> 00:38:45,550 We're also doing some other things we're not going to talk about. 400 00:38:45,550 --> 00:38:52,090 But here are some of the big things, the high-level things that we're doing to be prepared so that if we do get a phishing email, we know how to spot it. 401 00:38:52,090 --> 00:38:52,990 We know how to stop it. 402 00:38:52,990 --> 00:38:57,510 We can recover, you know, from those backups if we actually do get hit with it. 403 00:38:57,590 --> 00:39:07,170 And so I think that's why it's so important that the local election officials have a level of confidence that they can then reflect back on to their voters when it comes to elections. 404 00:39:07,950 --> 00:39:10,050 Yeah, just real quick on that. 405 00:39:10,050 --> 00:39:12,370 Maurice raises some really good points. 406 00:39:12,370 --> 00:39:31,930 And it's why we spent a lot of time at CISA on something we call the Last Mile Project, which is literally a poster project offering both risk assessment and then mitigation advice to the local level, almost 6,000 local jurisdictions specific to their state and their jurisdiction so that they can not only take the steps, 407 00:39:31,930 --> 00:39:42,970 whether it's multi-factor authentication or penetration testing or phishing campaign resilience or creating incident response plans, which we really focused on, but then can go and talk to their voters. 408 00:39:42,970 --> 00:39:45,530 And we've seen some cool approaches to this. 409 00:39:45,530 --> 00:39:53,530 We saw one state, the state of Iowa, take their posters out to the state fair so that they could talk to their voters directly about steps that they were taking. 410 00:39:53,530 --> 00:40:01,910 We saw the state of Rhode Island work with their libraries to put it up in the library system so that they could talk to voters through the libraries about this. 411 00:40:01,910 --> 00:40:11,130 And in the end, and I think Dave raises a really important point, there's resilience to cyber intrusion, resilience, and the ability to recover from incidents. 412 00:40:11,130 --> 00:40:16,510 But then there's the resilience that we need to install in talking to the American voter. 413 00:40:16,510 --> 00:40:21,270 We need voters that are prepared, that understand their registry. 414 00:40:21,270 --> 00:40:22,170 Am I registered? 415 00:40:22,170 --> 00:40:23,090 What's on my ballot? 416 00:40:23,090 --> 00:40:29,230 What are my voting options, particularly amongst COVID, so that they can have confidence on how they're going to engage the process? 417 00:40:29,230 --> 00:40:43,850 We need a voter that is patient, that understands that perhaps election night results won't be as complete as what we're used to in a given jurisdiction, and that the accuracy of the vote count is the most important thing, regardless of the time it takes. 418 00:40:43,890 --> 00:40:47,070 And then we need a voter that participates, that engages. 419 00:40:47,070 --> 00:41:01,770 We need, you know, 250,000 or more poll workers across this country in preparation for November in the midst of COVID when we have poll workers that, you know, are going to be unwilling to work, either because their age or high-risk nature. 420 00:41:02,130 --> 00:41:10,790 And so having people engaged and participating, the reality for those folks that are listening, no one told me anyone would be listening to this, so now I'm a little worried. 421 00:41:10,790 --> 00:41:15,970 But anyone that is listening, go sign up to be a poll worker if you want to understand the process. 422 00:41:15,970 --> 00:41:19,070 Matt Blaze hits this every time, and he's exactly right. 423 00:41:19,070 --> 00:41:25,970 If you have questions, if you have concerns, if you want to help secure the process, start off by being an election worker. 424 00:41:25,970 --> 00:41:27,530 You're not going to get turned down. 425 00:41:27,530 --> 00:41:28,650 We need you. 426 00:41:28,810 --> 00:41:35,770 And it's the best way to learn where the resiliency exists in the process, where improvements can be made in order to get involved. 427 00:41:35,770 --> 00:41:41,830 If you can't be a poll worker, if you can't take on that risk, there are opportunities to watch pre-election testing of systems. 428 00:41:41,830 --> 00:41:47,150 We run elections at the local level so you can participate directly with those who run the process. 429 00:41:47,150 --> 00:41:49,030 So go get your questions answered. 430 00:41:49,050 --> 00:41:54,170 Go engage with them and see what kind of support they're in need of, in particular serving as an election worker. 431 00:41:54,170 --> 00:41:59,010 It really is the best path to doing this and the best way to learn the process. 432 00:41:59,010 --> 00:42:03,950 But if we can have voters, voters are our last line of resilience, as Director Krebs says. 433 00:42:03,950 --> 00:42:11,690 They're the ones that can really ensure a responsive, resilient process when attempts to undermine confidence are there. 434 00:42:12,770 --> 00:42:16,070 There is no such thing as a secure system, right? 435 00:42:16,070 --> 00:42:18,870 We never hit the plateau where it's like, oh, we're good. 436 00:42:18,870 --> 00:42:22,110 We can all pack up, go home and take the next year off. 437 00:42:22,110 --> 00:42:29,330 So quick question from a lot of interested citizens who want to get involved. 438 00:42:29,330 --> 00:42:34,050 Ties to the fact around, OK, so you talk about detection being a key part of that secure system. 439 00:42:34,430 --> 00:42:37,590 Where exactly are they supposed to go to figure out where to say something? 440 00:42:39,010 --> 00:42:41,810 Well, you can go to your local FBI field office. 441 00:42:42,590 --> 00:42:52,230 You can go on to FBI.gov and find out contacts or contact our FBI CyWatch directly. 442 00:42:52,570 --> 00:43:00,070 And you can go to multiple other agencies as well, because what we've really said is a call to one is a call to all. 443 00:43:00,070 --> 00:43:08,110 And that's how we are ensuring that there's that kind of information sharing across the board here. 444 00:43:11,450 --> 00:43:15,070 I was just going to say, Cynthia is exactly right. 445 00:43:16,010 --> 00:43:23,350 First of all, if you know something within your community, engaging directly with the local election officials is really critical to help understand. 446 00:43:23,350 --> 00:43:27,310 Did you actually find something or is this something they're aware of? 447 00:43:27,310 --> 00:43:32,350 Otherwise, the second part is engaging with your state officials. 448 00:43:32,350 --> 00:43:34,070 They're prepared to take it on. 449 00:43:34,070 --> 00:43:37,410 They're the ones that know the process, know their systems, can talk to the vendors. 450 00:43:37,410 --> 00:43:42,170 And then the ISAC exists for exactly this reason as well. 451 00:43:42,230 --> 00:44:01,430 There's an avenue, and it happens fairly commonly, that if you report to the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing Analysis Center or directly into CISA, we now have the points of contact that we didn't have in 2016 to be able to get valuable information to state and local election officials so that they can take action on something that's identified. 452 00:44:01,430 --> 00:44:03,110 There are avenues. 453 00:44:03,110 --> 00:44:05,530 Again, the state and local officials know their systems. 454 00:44:05,530 --> 00:44:09,290 They're the best prepared to mitigate a problem. 455 00:44:09,290 --> 00:44:16,510 But if you're not finding success that route, the ISAC, CISA, FBI field office are available to help you get there. 456 00:44:16,670 --> 00:44:23,670 And understandably, some folks may not want to go to the federal government, which is why the ISAC really offers a nice safe place to begin that reporting. 457 00:44:23,830 --> 00:44:25,950 I'll offer up EAC as well. 458 00:44:25,950 --> 00:44:28,690 You can send an email to security at EAC.gov. 459 00:44:28,690 --> 00:44:31,130 Obviously, we have connections with all the manufacturers. 460 00:44:31,130 --> 00:44:40,310 If you're having trouble with a particular manufacturer or having trouble with a particular agency or your local official, or just not getting the response you want, we're happy to help facilitate that conversation. 461 00:44:41,190 --> 00:44:49,350 And just from a cyber count standpoint, one of the big changes for us is, you know, we historically had been focused, you know, working inside SCIFs. 462 00:44:49,350 --> 00:44:55,970 And one of the things that we've really done in support of 2020 is, you know, we have organizations now that live outside SCIFs. 463 00:44:55,970 --> 00:44:58,990 They're on NIPRNet or unclassified internet. 464 00:44:58,990 --> 00:45:00,550 You know, they're in Slack channels. 465 00:45:00,550 --> 00:45:01,950 They're talking to FBI. 466 00:45:01,950 --> 00:45:03,410 They're talking to DHS. 467 00:45:03,410 --> 00:45:05,410 They're talking to private industry partners. 468 00:45:05,410 --> 00:45:13,230 And they're, you know, they're living in that same ecosystem that many of the folks that are listening to this presentation are. 469 00:45:13,230 --> 00:45:25,270 And so we have really tried to adapt some of our behavior so we're able to, you know, in real time collaborate with our partners across government, you know, on a little different time schedule than would be a traditional military one. 470 00:45:25,270 --> 00:45:29,950 Because I know most of you are probably not up at 530 in the morning doing just the same. 471 00:45:31,530 --> 00:45:41,490 So Bill Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence Security Center, just recently put out an official statement today talking about the very threat that we're covering here. 472 00:45:41,750 --> 00:45:45,510 But all of the threats were basically laid out in an equal manner. 473 00:45:45,510 --> 00:45:46,810 Would you say the threats are equal? 474 00:45:46,810 --> 00:45:48,770 Which one would you say is the biggest and why? 475 00:45:50,210 --> 00:45:55,250 Well, I don't think we need to take any of the threats lightly, right? 476 00:45:55,250 --> 00:46:04,170 I think the statement in terms of what you saw out there, it lays out how each adversary is approaching the problem. 477 00:46:04,170 --> 00:46:16,890 Certainly, you know, Russia, China, Iran, they all have intent and they all do activities that they think are advancing their best interests here. 478 00:46:16,890 --> 00:46:25,210 So, you know, I don't think I would say like one is scarier than the other, per se. 479 00:46:25,490 --> 00:46:36,570 Certainly, some of these adversaries are a bit more experienced at this in terms of the amount of time they've been working, you know, doing operations. 480 00:46:36,570 --> 00:46:41,690 But, you know, from our perspective, you know, I care about all those threats. 481 00:46:41,870 --> 00:46:48,570 I take them all seriously because, you know, again, some of the stuff is very cheap to get into and to execute. 482 00:46:48,770 --> 00:46:54,110 So, you know, I wouldn't do a value judgment on those. 483 00:46:54,690 --> 00:46:56,890 I totally agree more on that. 484 00:46:56,890 --> 00:47:06,290 And I think that it's really important to remember that our threat picture is always informed by what we collect, what we know. 485 00:47:06,290 --> 00:47:08,970 And, you know, we don't have perfect pictures. 486 00:47:08,970 --> 00:47:16,790 And how we really have to approach all of this is what could be the effect from these various groups? 487 00:47:16,790 --> 00:47:19,690 What could happen closer to September, October? 488 00:47:19,690 --> 00:47:23,210 Because, you know, it still is a few months away. 489 00:47:23,210 --> 00:47:28,810 And we need to be prepared for a lot of different things happening within that. 490 00:47:28,810 --> 00:47:31,290 You know, I'm going to flip stop again. 491 00:47:31,290 --> 00:47:33,110 You know, it doesn't just have to be the big three. 492 00:47:33,110 --> 00:47:46,270 It can be other non-state actors or criminal groups and the like that are going to undermine people's confidence in our system. 493 00:47:46,270 --> 00:47:58,470 And really, if you ask me what the biggest threat is, it's these constant drumbeat or influence campaigns that are going to make people feel like they're less confident in our system. 494 00:47:58,470 --> 00:48:00,550 And that could be people who vote less. 495 00:48:00,950 --> 00:48:03,990 And that's really where, you know, I stand tonight. 496 00:48:05,430 --> 00:48:07,170 Hey, Bryson, just real quick. 497 00:48:07,170 --> 00:48:11,250 Everyone in the Fed room actually has to take a drink because the Fed said foot stomp. 498 00:48:11,310 --> 00:48:14,830 So that's actually one sip for everyone in the Fed room. 499 00:48:16,690 --> 00:48:17,470 Thanks. 500 00:48:19,230 --> 00:48:24,650 Matt, I can't help but feel like you're cheating the system a little bit because you don't have a drink. 501 00:48:24,650 --> 00:48:27,230 I've been drinking this whole panel. 502 00:48:27,230 --> 00:48:27,810 Don't worry. 503 00:48:27,810 --> 00:48:28,630 I'm good. 504 00:48:31,470 --> 00:48:32,650 Hey, put up or shut up. 505 00:48:32,650 --> 00:48:33,630 Show us your drink. 506 00:48:34,770 --> 00:48:36,950 It's in a water bottle, but it's vodka. 507 00:48:38,950 --> 00:48:41,030 So we're coming close to our end of time. 508 00:48:41,030 --> 00:48:46,990 So I want to ask a final sort of grab bag questions to each of you. 509 00:48:47,650 --> 00:48:49,830 And you have about a minute to respond. 510 00:48:50,530 --> 00:48:57,510 So you get a non-internet connected wand, magic wand that you can wave. 511 00:48:57,510 --> 00:49:00,410 Is that the magic wand? 512 00:49:00,750 --> 00:49:02,190 Yes, that is how it is. 513 00:49:02,190 --> 00:49:03,490 Wireless, but wired. 514 00:49:04,530 --> 00:49:09,410 And with this magic wand, you can have one thing happen for your agency instantaneously. 515 00:49:10,290 --> 00:49:11,750 This isn't reality, right? 516 00:49:11,750 --> 00:49:15,450 This isn't, oh, if only I could get that $20 million to fund that. 517 00:49:15,450 --> 00:49:18,530 This is, what do you wish from a process perspective? 518 00:49:19,910 --> 00:49:23,110 So 2020 is almost written. 519 00:49:23,690 --> 00:49:25,770 The mail-in ballots start in a month. 520 00:49:25,770 --> 00:49:26,870 People start voting. 521 00:49:26,870 --> 00:49:27,990 Those start happening. 522 00:49:28,250 --> 00:49:30,410 2024 is our next big one. 523 00:49:30,410 --> 00:49:36,370 What is one good thing and one thing we really need to worry about in the future in 2024? 524 00:49:37,750 --> 00:49:41,550 See, I feel like I'm the shortstop being right next to you. 525 00:49:42,210 --> 00:49:43,830 I like you the most. 526 00:49:43,830 --> 00:49:45,050 Okay. 527 00:49:47,870 --> 00:50:08,750 So thinking about what I really wish we had more of is I wish we had more people right now with the cyber skillset that we could hire quickly and get them on. 528 00:50:08,750 --> 00:50:16,550 So that we could just expand our scope and scale and speed in which we're addressing threats. 529 00:50:16,770 --> 00:50:21,570 And I think that that goes towards, you know, we're putting in so much of what we have against the election. 530 00:50:21,570 --> 00:50:23,850 And I feel really good about where we're at on it. 531 00:50:23,850 --> 00:50:26,910 But what does that take away from some of the other work? 532 00:50:27,190 --> 00:50:28,910 And that, you know, that worries me. 533 00:50:28,910 --> 00:50:36,890 And I'd like us to know that we have the people coming to us that want to do the right thing. 534 00:50:36,950 --> 00:50:45,110 That want to protect America and have those skills necessary to be able to help us in that. 535 00:50:45,110 --> 00:50:47,670 As it looks towards 2024, what do I want to keep? 536 00:50:48,490 --> 00:50:53,180 So I hope we keep the collaboration and the focus alive. 537 00:50:53,180 --> 00:50:57,340 In my opening remarks, I gave a real quick overview of what the FBI does. 538 00:50:57,440 --> 00:51:03,660 Part of it is focused on cyber investigations, looking at influence. 539 00:51:03,660 --> 00:51:06,820 We developed the Foreign Influence Task Force. 540 00:51:07,260 --> 00:51:14,200 And that effort, I think, has really helped us focus on it's not just a cyber issue. 541 00:51:14,200 --> 00:51:15,960 It's not just a criminal issue. 542 00:51:15,960 --> 00:51:17,300 It's not just an influence issue. 543 00:51:17,300 --> 00:51:19,400 It's seeing how it all works together. 544 00:51:19,420 --> 00:51:23,620 Internal, getting the China people to talk to the Russian people to talk to the cyber crime people. 545 00:51:23,620 --> 00:51:26,620 And looking at it as one threat. 546 00:51:27,600 --> 00:51:33,100 That's new within the federal government to really consider it in that space. 547 00:51:33,100 --> 00:51:36,180 And I want to keep that moving forward. 548 00:51:36,180 --> 00:51:40,300 I think that, yeah, that's... 549 00:51:40,920 --> 00:51:41,680 Did I get all your questions? 550 00:51:41,680 --> 00:51:45,060 You asked a spectrum of a few of them here. 551 00:51:46,260 --> 00:51:47,360 But yeah. 552 00:51:47,360 --> 00:51:52,800 And I hope we all stay in touch after we put this in our rear view mirror. 553 00:51:53,540 --> 00:51:56,640 If you don't stay in touch, then the next panel is going to be more awkward. 554 00:51:58,740 --> 00:52:03,040 I think the one answer is pretty easy for me. 555 00:52:03,180 --> 00:52:08,120 Perfect insight into adversary intents and operations is obviously a great thing to have. 556 00:52:08,960 --> 00:52:11,080 Dave, you're not supposed to say that you don't have that. 557 00:52:14,380 --> 00:52:18,540 So, I mean, that's just going to inform our activities moving forward. 558 00:52:19,380 --> 00:52:21,580 Hitting a little bit on Cynthia's point. 559 00:52:21,580 --> 00:52:25,540 And going back a bit to a comment I made before in terms of working counterterrorism. 560 00:52:25,540 --> 00:52:28,020 A lot of times you're fighting the last war, right? 561 00:52:28,240 --> 00:52:31,720 Someone tries to blow up a plane with printer cartridges. 562 00:52:31,840 --> 00:52:34,420 The government swarms to figure out how to stop that. 563 00:52:34,420 --> 00:52:36,000 But then the adversary moves on. 564 00:52:36,000 --> 00:52:38,700 The same thing here. 565 00:52:38,700 --> 00:52:41,580 We've seen adversaries evolve. 566 00:52:41,580 --> 00:52:44,420 We've seen new adversaries come in. 567 00:52:44,920 --> 00:52:49,040 So there's always worry about what you don't know. 568 00:52:49,040 --> 00:52:55,080 But what I'm confident in is that we are positioned, a lot better positioned now, for agility. 569 00:52:55,080 --> 00:53:00,700 In terms of responding to these threats because of the systems we've set up, the partnerships we have. 570 00:53:00,700 --> 00:53:05,220 That is certainly something for 2024 we need to keep building on. 571 00:53:05,220 --> 00:53:08,660 And not losing sight of it when new problems come up. 572 00:53:08,760 --> 00:53:10,840 Not making sure this remains a focus. 573 00:53:10,840 --> 00:53:14,480 I think the DEFCON voting village is very important to keep this running. 574 00:53:14,480 --> 00:53:15,840 We need people's help. 575 00:53:16,300 --> 00:53:19,380 From NSA specifically, we have a much... 576 00:53:19,380 --> 00:53:23,580 We're investing a lot more in the White Hat brand. 577 00:53:24,820 --> 00:53:27,620 NSA cyber Twitter account, please go follow it. 578 00:53:27,620 --> 00:53:29,820 You're going to see more good stuff coming out of that. 579 00:53:30,680 --> 00:53:34,820 But continuing to build upon that is going to be a critical thing we're going to invest in. 580 00:53:34,820 --> 00:53:40,500 Moving forward, I can't tell you how excited some of the people were in our building. 581 00:53:40,500 --> 00:53:44,540 Like late May, the cybersecurity advisory on the GRU. 582 00:53:44,540 --> 00:53:46,880 On the mail vulnerability. 583 00:53:47,120 --> 00:53:51,480 Seeing at least five different cybersecurity companies take that information. 584 00:53:51,480 --> 00:53:54,700 Pivot on the indicators in their own data sets. 585 00:53:54,700 --> 00:53:58,260 Figuring out new things that we didn't even know about. 586 00:53:58,300 --> 00:54:02,620 To uncover more of an adversary operation. 587 00:54:02,620 --> 00:54:05,420 That got people excited in the building. 588 00:54:05,800 --> 00:54:08,860 And that's something we do want to do more of. 589 00:54:08,860 --> 00:54:11,080 And again, just hitting on that critical partnership. 590 00:54:11,080 --> 00:54:14,780 And that dynamic of us using each other's information. 591 00:54:14,780 --> 00:54:17,620 And building the security of the enterprise. 592 00:54:17,620 --> 00:54:18,360 Raising all those. 593 00:54:18,360 --> 00:54:19,880 It sounds kind of Pollyanna-ish. 594 00:54:19,880 --> 00:54:22,040 But I think it's really important. 595 00:54:23,840 --> 00:54:24,600 Hey, Bryce. 596 00:54:24,600 --> 00:54:27,640 If I could wave a magic wand, I would wave it. 597 00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:30,140 And we would get COVID-19 under control. 598 00:54:30,860 --> 00:54:33,460 I just got to tell you, there's great collaboration. 599 00:54:33,460 --> 00:54:35,320 But we could do so much more. 600 00:54:35,640 --> 00:54:38,560 We could do so much more with our partners here. 601 00:54:38,600 --> 00:54:40,820 We could do so much more overseas. 602 00:54:41,300 --> 00:54:43,760 If we could get the pandemic under control. 603 00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:46,200 So please wear your mask and help us do that. 604 00:54:46,200 --> 00:54:49,780 The second piece, where do we see this in 2024? 605 00:54:50,100 --> 00:54:52,980 You do get asked questions, but I get to answer the question a lot. 606 00:54:53,220 --> 00:54:55,820 I would rather focus on 2020. 607 00:54:55,820 --> 00:54:58,640 2020 is not a foregone conclusion. 608 00:54:58,640 --> 00:55:01,960 We can have a safe, secure, and credible election. 609 00:55:01,980 --> 00:55:05,140 As an American people, we need to mobilize. 610 00:55:05,480 --> 00:55:07,920 There are thousands of smart people. 611 00:55:08,320 --> 00:55:12,900 Extraordinarily technically capable that are watching this session right now. 612 00:55:12,900 --> 00:55:15,940 Please go work at polling stations. 613 00:55:15,940 --> 00:55:17,540 Please talk to DHS. 614 00:55:17,540 --> 00:55:19,760 Please talk to the FBI. 615 00:55:20,080 --> 00:55:22,540 Again, we are all in. 616 00:55:22,540 --> 00:55:28,420 We have thousands of people that are going to work every day in order to support a safe, secure, and credible election. 617 00:55:28,600 --> 00:55:31,000 And I would just ask for everybody's help. 618 00:55:32,240 --> 00:55:33,760 I like your magic wand answer. 619 00:55:33,760 --> 00:55:35,060 I really appreciate that. 620 00:55:35,060 --> 00:55:38,060 It gives a greater sense of where we all are in the world today. 621 00:55:38,220 --> 00:55:49,980 If I could wave my magic wand on EAC, I would say that we would be doing better to get the VBSG more flexible and faster responding. 622 00:55:49,980 --> 00:56:03,860 So this idea that if we can get you researchers interested in election infrastructure and discover those vulnerabilities, report them responsibly, and then we can get the manufacturers to patch and get those out in the field in a much faster turnaround, 623 00:56:03,860 --> 00:56:06,920 I think we'd be in a much better position. 624 00:56:06,920 --> 00:56:08,020 We're working toward that. 625 00:56:08,020 --> 00:56:13,080 It's still a process that takes some time, but I think we can get there by 2024. 626 00:56:13,560 --> 00:56:19,520 And just to recognize that federal elections are every two years, but locals are running elections every few weeks. 627 00:56:19,560 --> 00:56:26,300 And so there's a bigger stake at play, because every election that's run is a chance to show that we can do democracy right. 628 00:56:26,300 --> 00:56:27,460 We're going to keep doing it. 629 00:56:27,460 --> 00:56:29,880 And it's done very well most of the time. 630 00:56:29,880 --> 00:56:35,440 It's just those few times where there's those hiccups that we have some trouble and it starts to erode that confidence. 631 00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:40,340 So the better we can get at getting those patches, the much better off the whole system will run. 632 00:56:42,040 --> 00:56:49,420 Yeah, so the magic wand, I got two answers, I think, and I had the advantage of time, which is useful. 633 00:56:49,620 --> 00:57:09,760 The first is, if there is a way for CISA to push out service agreements or whatever the case may be to upgrade election systems, not just voting systems, where most of the focus goes, but election systems, including workstations, off of outdated and unsupported software, 634 00:57:09,760 --> 00:57:12,520 I absolutely want to do that. 635 00:57:12,660 --> 00:57:14,000 It's not just Windows 7. 636 00:57:14,000 --> 00:57:15,240 We're talking older. 637 00:57:16,040 --> 00:57:20,560 It's not that the local election officials or state officials don't want to upgrade. 638 00:57:20,560 --> 00:57:25,500 It's that they lack either the IT support or resources, and I'd love to be able to give that to them. 639 00:57:25,500 --> 00:57:33,440 The second is getting to 100% auditability across the nation and having efficient, effective audits for 2020. 640 00:57:33,440 --> 00:57:42,800 We're going to be upwards of 92 plus percent of auditable records, but we need good, efficient, effective audits that are transparent. 641 00:57:43,020 --> 00:57:44,960 I mean, Neil McBurnett asked a question earlier. 642 00:57:44,960 --> 00:57:48,800 He's making it his mission in life to get to this, and I so appreciate it. 643 00:57:48,800 --> 00:57:57,340 If we can provide that public, that transparent auditing process, efficient and effective, I think it would be a real success. 644 00:57:57,340 --> 00:58:03,980 Looking forward, there's something in elections called the election wall, where you literally lack the ability to look past the next election. 645 00:58:03,980 --> 00:58:29,060 You don't even know what life looks like beyond that, but if I had to really push myself through that, it would be increasing the amount of support resources and I don't just mean money, to state and local officials to help them meaningfully manage the risk to their systems and really take some of the innovative steps that they want to take that they're unable to, 646 00:58:29,060 --> 00:58:35,880 either because of a lack of IT support or resourcing that otherwise would allow them to serve voters. 647 00:58:35,880 --> 00:58:55,880 And then finally, I know I'm cheating, but a more resilient American public, a deeper understanding of how elections work, a deeper understanding of what their options are, how ballots reach them, or how they can interact with the process, and then how we reach our final certified elections. 648 00:58:55,880 --> 00:59:00,940 Again, that prepared, patient, and participating voter is everything as we look at 2020. 649 00:59:02,300 --> 00:59:08,160 I feel the same way, Matt, as a village organizer for DEF CON that I can't look past this weekend. 650 00:59:09,020 --> 00:59:14,860 So , thank you to all of the panelists for sharing what your organization is doing. 651 00:59:15,000 --> 00:59:25,420 I have to say it is making me feel a lot better, understanding the level of collaboration, the transparency on the fallibility and the improvement, and very much looking forward to what we can do. 652 00:59:25,420 --> 00:59:28,740 We are all citizens and our voices should be heard. 653 00:59:28,740 --> 00:59:29,520 Thank you. 654 00:59:29,520 --> 00:59:30,920 Thank you.